Breves, longas and other long durations

A breve is a duration equal to two whole notes. Abjad supports breve-durated notes, rests and chords with and without dots.

You can create breves with a LilyPond input string:

>>> note_1 = Note(r"c'\breve")
>>> note_2 = Note(r"d'\breve.")

Or with an explicit duration:

>>> note_3 = Note("e'", Duration(2, 1))
>>> note_4 = Note("f'", Duration(3, 1))

The written duration of a breve always returns an Abjad duration object:

>>> notes = [note_1, note_2, note_3, note_4]
>>> for note in notes:
...     note, note.written_duration
(Note("c'\\breve"), Duration(2, 1))
(Note("d'\\breve."), Duration(3, 1))
(Note("e'\\breve"), Duration(2, 1))
(Note("f'\\breve."), Duration(3, 1))

LilyPond renders breves like this:

>>> staff = Staff(notes)
>>> show(staff)

Abjad also supports longas. A longa equals two breves:

>>> note_1 = Note(r"c'\longa")
>>> note_2 = Note("d'", Duration(6, 1))
>>> notes = [note_1, note_2]
>>> for note in notes:
...     note, note.written_duration
(Note("c'\\longa"), Duration(4, 1))
(Note("d'\\longa."), Duration(6, 1))
>>> staff = Staff(notes)
>>> show(staff)

A maxima is a duration equal to two longas:

>>> note_1 = Note(r"c'\maxima")
>>> note_2 = Note("d'", Duration(12, 1))
>>> notes = [note_1, note_2]
>>> for note in notes:
...     note, note.written_duration
(Note("c'\\maxima"), Duration(8, 1))
(Note("d'\\maxima."), Duration(12, 1))

Abjad supports maximas and LilyPond supplies a \maxima command. But you can not use Abjad to render maxima-valued notes, rests and chords because LilyPond supplies no glyphs for these durations.

The same is true for all durations greater than or equal to eight whole notes: you can initialize and work with all such durations in Abjad but you will only be able to use LilyPond to render as notation those values equal to less than eight whole notes.

LilyPond multipliers

LilyPond provides an asterisk * operator to scale the durations of notes, rests and chords by arbitrarily positive rational values. LilyPond multipliers are indivisible and generate no typographic output of their own. However, while independent from the typographic output, LilyPond multipliers do factor into calculations of duration.

Abjad implements LilyPond multpliers as multiplier objects.

>>> note = Note("c'4")
>>> attach(Multiplier(1, 2), note)
>>> print(format(note))
c'4 * 1/2
>>> note.written_duration
Duration(1, 4)
>>> inspect_(note).get_duration()
Duration(1, 8)
>>> show(note)

LilyPond multipliers scale the durations of the half notes below to that of quarter notes:

>>> quarter_notes = 4 * Note("c'4")
>>> half_note = Note("c'2")
>>> attach(Multiplier(1, 2), half_note)
>>> half_notes = 4 * half_note
>>> top_staff = scoretools.Staff(quarter_notes, context_name='RhythmicStaff')
>>> bottom_staff = scoretools.Staff(half_notes, context_name='RhythmicStaff')
>>> staff_group = scoretools.StaffGroup([top_staff, bottom_staff])
>>> show(staff_group)

Note that the LilyPond multiplication * operator differs from the Abjad multiplication * operator. LilyPond multiplication scales duration of LilyPond notes, rests and chords. Abjad multiplication copies Abjad containers and leaves.

What’s the difference between duration and written duration?

Abjad uses the term “written duration” to refer to the face value of notes, rests and chords prior to time-scaling effects of tuplets or measures with unusual time signatures. Abjad’s written duration corresponds to the informal names most frequently used when talking about note duration.

Consider the measure below:

>>> measure = Measure((5, 16), "c16 c c c c")
>>> beam = Beam()
>>> attach(beam, [measure])
>>> staff = scoretools.Staff([measure], context_name='RhythmicStaff')
>>> show(staff)

Every note in the measure equals one sixteenth of a whole note:

>>> note = measure[0]
>>> inspect_(note).get_duration()
Duration(1, 16)

But now consider this measure:

>>> tuplet = Tuplet((4, 5), "c16 c c c c")
>>> measure = Measure((4, 16), [tuplet])
>>> beam = Beam()
>>> attach(beam, [measure])
>>> staff = scoretools.Staff([measure], context_name='RhythmicStaff')
>>> show(staff)

The notes in this measure are equal to only one twentieth of a whole note: Every note in this measures

>>> note = tuplet[0]
>>> inspect_(note).get_duration()
Duration(1, 20)

The notes in this measure are “sixteenth notes” with a duration equal to a value other than 1/16. Abjad formalizes this distinction in the difference between the duration of these notes (1/20) and written duration of these notes (1/16).

Written duration is a user-assignable value. Users can assign and reassign the written duration of notes, rests and chords at initialization or any time thereafter. But the (unqualified) duration of a note, rest or chord is a derived property Abjad calculates based on the rhythmic context governing the note, rest or chord.

What does it mean for a duration to be “assignable”?

Western notation makes it easy to notate notes, rests and chords with durations like 1/4 and 3/16. But notating notes, rests and chords with durations like 1/3 can only be done with recourse to tuplets or ties.

Abjad formalizes the difference between durations like 1/4 and 1/5 in the concept of assignability: a duration n/d is assignable when and only when numerator n is of the form k(2**u-j) and denominator d is of the form 2**v. In this definition u and v must be nonnegative integers, k must be a positive integer, and j must be either 0 or 1.

Assignability is important because it explains why you can set the duration of any note, rest or chord to 1/4 but never to 1/5.